Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Your Nextdoor PCP's avatar

This is a genuinely meaningful move for the field! I see the same bottleneck you’re naming: we’re drowning in biomarkers, wearables, and “AI insights”, but the scarce resource is still clinical interpretation + accountable protocols, turning measurement into outcomes without drifting into wellness theater.

What I particularly appreciate about longevitydocs.network is the emphasis on the “physician layer” as infrastructure (trial leadership, protocol development, claims validation, education), not just a directory. If longevity medicine is going to mature into a credible discipline, it needs exactly this: vetted clinicians, standardized endpoints (function, frailty metrics, cardiometabolic risk, cognition), and guardrails around hype (peptides, supplements, noisy panels) so patients aren’t paying for certainty theater.

Excited to see physician-led networks that can partner with industry while keeping the north star clear: rigor, safety, and measurable healthspan!

No posts

Ready for more?